Editorial Notes: The September, "End of Summer" posting of the Communities in Transition Information Resource

by hans peter meyer, editor

Welcome to the September issue of the CIT Information Resource!

Food

It's appropriate that "food" should be at the top of our posts this "harvest" issue. There's a growing "foodie" culture, at least a part of which is focused on "local" and "organic." We are beginning to realize that Big Food, like so many Big things, isn't always looking out for the best interests of communities. In what has almost become a regular column, George Penfold weighs in with timely insights on the realities of harvest: What does it mean when communities or regions say they want to be self-reliant as food producers? What are the challenges to this "motherhood" topic? George's questions should be asked of every region and community that announces its intention to be Canada's next "Provence" or "Tuscany."

Green Values Vancouver Island
What does it mean to a region when huge tracts of land are moving towards development? This is one the questions Tim Pringle addresses in his current article, an overview of one of the big conservation, real estate, and governance opportunities (and challenges) in BC: the question concerning the future of the highly attractive EN Land Grant lands on the east coast of Vancouver Island.

CIT Project Summary - the Lake Windermere Project
CIT is also about on-the-ground projects addressing issues that affect the day-to-day health and quality of life in BC communities. An overview of the past 12 months or so of CIT grants is provided, as well as a summary of the four-year Healthy Water, Healthy Communities – Lake Windermere project. As project coordinator Heather Leschied indicates, long time residents in the Lake Windermere region are starting to weigh the costs and benefits of amenity-related development, and "are seeing that this has long-term implications for the aquatic health of the system." Foundation project funding through the CIT program is helping to establish baseline scientific data that is then feeding into public education, as well as local and provincial government policy.

BC Land Summit coverage continues
We continue our coverage of one of the significant gatherings of land use practitioners in the province, the May 2009 BC Land Summit. In this issue we include an interview with social researcher Angus McAllister, whose work on "solving for similarity" is helping to shape some new and positive ways of building and re-building communities and neighbourhoods.

Gaining Ground Summit: Resilient Cities, October 20-22
Finally, we conclude this end of summer issue with a look ahead to the upcoming Gaining Ground Summit: Resilient Cities (GGRC09). We interview Gene Miller, the visionary behind the Gaining Ground Summit series on what GG is, and why it's important today. As an aside, it's important to note that while Resilient Cities may be about "cities," the lessons and methodologies apply equally to small communities: in the face of significant and common challenges (ie. climate change), we are all called on to be imaginative, informed, and ready to try new ways of working together, new ways of looking at our resources and our challenges. As Gene suggests, there is a "note of hope and optimism" sounded by the GGSummit series. Something most BC communities – and citizens – would likely enjoy hearing.

Stepping into Social Media at CIT
About half a year ago CIT stepped into the "social media" world with this blog. The CIT Information Resource is now taking some additional steps into other forms of social media. We've just set up a Facebook page, as well as Twitter, Flickr, and YouTube accounts. There's not much at any of these accounts – yet. We encourage you to share your words and images with us. Tag your posts with "#CIT" or "#CITinfoResource" (and, if you're at GGRC09, please tag everything with #GGRC09). That helps us share some of the many inspiring things that are happening, either directly through the CIT program or through the agency of our partners.

Why are we taking these steps? We're hoping that they'll become very useful tools for sharing the insights, knowledge, and experience of creating healthy, thriving neighbourhoods, communities, and regions. For example, most of us can't regularly travel from Vanderhoof or Castlegar or Cumberland to be at gatherings in Vancouver, Victoria – or Prince George. GGRC09 is going to be great. Many of us won't be able to make it due to financial, familial, or work constraints. With "on site" and "live" postings, however, as well as after-the-fact postings of blogs, photographs, and vidoes, we can tap into these events, share our observations and stories, and give these kinds of events a "longer tail" than a 2-3 day event usually has.

What can you do? Please check out and contribute to our social media resources. Leave comments on our blog posts. Send us links to project and event posts – pics, videos, blogs, tweets, etc. We'll be sharing stories about communities in transition, about people making a difference. Help us be more effective in what we do, so that we can be more effective in helping you. Join us online!

Use and share these resources
One of the hallmarks of the Real Estate Foundation's 22+ years is collaboration and sharing of resources. We actively encourage the reproduction of CIT Information Resource articles and materials for non-profit educational purposes. In return, we ask that you please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

– 30 –

©Real Estate Foundation of BC / 2009. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website for non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

Thoughts on Regional Food Security & Self-Reliance

by George Penfold

A recently published a report on BC’s food self-reliance shows that in spite of our large productive agricultural areas in the Lower Mainland and the Okanagan, BC is only 48% self-reliant in food. Our only food surplus in BC is in fruit. On the other hand, Canada continues to be a net exporter of agricultural and related food products to the tune of $6 Billion in 2007.

Given that Canada produces more agriculture and agri food value than we consume, what does "food security " mean in the discussion about local food?

I prefer the term food self-sufficiency to describe what we are trying to achieve. Food security is a term that has been traditionally used to deal with the issues of lack of food, hunger and starvation. That is not what most local food initiatives in BC or across Canada are about. They are focused more on increasing local/regional food self-reliance and expanding that part of the regional economy. By labeling this as food security, the fact that there are hungry people in our communities and around the world can be overlooked, and that would be an unfortunate outcome of the local food movement.

Food is Energy 
The drive for local food seems to hinge on concerns about higher energy costs. But, higher energy costs don’t necessarily mean we won’t have food. We will still probably be able to get most of what we want, but higher energy costs mean we will have to pay more for it. The implicit assumption that increasing local/regional food supply is an insurance plan against higher costs needs a second look, especially in the Kootenay region.

Transportation costs and the energy related concern about "food miles " can be misleading if looked at only on a distance basis. Yes, trucks do travel 3,500 km or more from California, but they carry 20 or more tonnes, about 6 kg of food per km travelled. Those trucks usually go back with other goods on board. If a local farmer travels 100 km from Grand Forks to the Castlegar farmers market, his or her truck – even using half as much fuel per km – would need to carry 300 kg of food product to use the same amount of energy for kg of food delivered as the truck from California. If the farmer goes back empty and consumers make a separate trip to go to the farmers market, the amount carried would have to be even greater.

Food is energy, and regardless of where it is grown, it will still take lots of energy to grow food in the future, if we rely on anything resembling current technologies. Our regional energy sources include hydro electricity, wood, and coal. None of these are easily adaptable to the oil based production systems we currently rely on. Converting to steam may be possible, but the GHGs (green house gas emissions) trade off isn't great unless much better steam technologies are developed.  Going back to manual labour or horses is a romantic idea, but one that would be very unlikely to produce the amount of food needed to support regional demand.

The "Grain-Gap"
If we want to be more self-sufficient regionally, we need a clearer focus on what we need to be growing. Most images of local food initiatives show fresh fruit and vegetables. The average Canadian consumes about 45 kg of fresh, frozen, and processed fruits and vegetables annually. But the core component of the current Canadian diet is grain, both eaten directly (cereals, bread, etc) and processed through poultry and livestock for eggs, milk, and related products and meat.

The self-sufficiency report noted above estimates that the average person consumes approximately 80 kg of grain directly (mostly wheat), and another 395 kg of feed grain consumed indirectly in the form of meat, eggs, milk etc. For the approximately 170,000 folks who live in the Columbia Basin and Boundary regions, that means we would need about 80 thousand tonnes of grain, or at 2.5 tonnes per hectare yield, approximately 32,000 hectares of grain to be self sufficient. In 2006, we grew less than 4,000 ha including all grains, beans, flax, and canola – just over 12% of our theoretical demand, significantly less than overall provincial self-sufficiency of 14% in food grain and 43% in feed grain.

Why aren’t we producing more? Lack of land doesn’t seem to be the major issue. We have approximately 375,000 hectares in the ALR in the three Kootenay Regional Districts, and about half of that is in "farms " as defined by Census Canada.

Do the Math
The main issue is that we simply don't pay enough for food to make growing it pay.

In 2006 there were 1,394 census farms in the three Kootenay Regional Districts, with only 40 of those producing certified organic products. The average capital value (land, livestock, equipment) of farms ranged from $1,325,360 in RD East Kootenay to $746,165 in RD Kootenay Boundary, and $682,663 in RD Central Kootenay. Average farm receipts were $39,420, $59,801, and $53,388 respectively. After gross expenses, however, net income was $133, $1680, and $5422 respectively.

That math is pretty clear. From significant capital investment, the average farmer makes very little or loses money. We will have to pay a lot more for food even at current energy prices if there was any realistic opportunity to reach regional self-sufficiency based on the premise of regional farmers producing more. The diversified "family farm" local food model we seem to want, one that generally existed 40 years ago, was based on spending almost 20% of average household income on food. We now spend less than 10%.

A Complex Situation
There are lots of other issues to consider in trying to reach regional self-sufficiency. Who will our "farmers" be? Where will the farm labour come from? Where will the nutrients come from - not just oil based nitrogen, but phosphate and potash, the water to irrigate? And how do we rebuild regional storage, processing, and distribution systems, among others?

There is no question that local food awareness, direct farms sales, farmers markets, and community and private gardens all help farmers and regional self-sufficiency, but that focus is mainly on fruits and vegetables. The "grain gap," however, is huge. Unless we are willing to make some significant changes – such as changing our consumption patterns, shifting to a grass based meat production system and paying more for local food – regional food self-sufficiency is probably not a realistic expectation.

 – 30 –


About the author:

GEORGE PENFOLD was, for a good part of his early life, a working farmer. His is now Regional Innovation Chair (RIC) in Rural Economic Development at Selkirk College in Castlegar, BC and Adjunct Professor at the School of Business and Economics at Thompson Rivers University in Kamloops, BC. In 2005 the Real Estate Foundation of BC contributed $100,000 to the RIC endowment fund at Selkirk College as part of its support for sustainable community planning and informed development in the greater Kootenay region.


©Real Estate Foundation of BC/ 2009. We encourage the reproduction of articles on this website for non-profit educational purposes. Please notify the Foundation and the author of all reproductions, including in-house uses.

Related articles

• Who Owns the Future of the Kootenays? (communitytransition.blogspot.com)
• When Things Slow Down: Opportunities for Sustainability (communitytransition.blogspot.com)
  
• Wondering About Aging Communities (communitytransition.org)
  
• Reader Question: The Cost of Eating Local (christie-corner.blogspot.com)